Skip to main content

What caused the recent US Financial Crisis

“What exactly happened” is a scope I don’t have answers for. But I do have a certain understanding I have gathered from the internet.

It started with the FED deciding to tighten the monetary policy. This resulted in low real interest rates. Returns from financial securities are tied to interest rates set by the FED such that the basic return [on their money] anybody can make is from a short-term government bond, which impacts the return customers are going to get when they put their money in the bank, which impacts the money people want if they decide to raise the stakes and put their money in some place riskier with the promise of higher returns such as buying from the stock market.

In fact there are a number of different types of securities available such as the various kinds of stocks and bonds. All these securities make an inverted pyramid that make up all the financial instruments available for people to trade in.

So back to our story… when the FED reduced the interest rates all the financial securities were affected such that all of them were now providing low returns.

At this time people were becoming interested in buying houses in the US.

With an increasing trend in real estate purchases “mortgages” came in high demand.

Financial engineers developed a number of securities [that were part of the financial pyramid] that were based on these mortgages [with mortgages being the fundamental instrument at the bottom of the pyramid on which all these securities were based]. Since fundamentally people were buying houses, mortgages and all mortgage-based-instruments were a strong investment option for customers.

At a certain point in time a lot of real estate had been purchased in the US and there were signs that new customers would not come forward to buy real estate.

If I understand correctly Freddie Mac and Fannie May the two companies who owned most of the mortgages sold in the US were asked by the US Senate for a plan. At this point the two companies decided to enter the sub-prime market [prime is a credit rating threshold for a debtor below which he is denied a loan and above which he qualifies to get a loan. A sub-prime applicant is one who falls below this credit threshold] taking the percentage share of the sub-prime debtors in the mortgage market from below 5 % to about 20%.

When the sub-prime market came to its exhaustion point like the main market before it there were signs of trouble.

Investors decided to sell their share of mortgage-based-securities but nobody was willing to buy. The banks that had a major investment in these mortgage-based-securities were asked to mark-to-market these investments [mark to market means to mark the value of the security on their books at the market price] by [I think] the State Bank.

When this happened, the reserves of banks took a huge fall over-night and as a result they could not meet their reserve requirements [reserve requirement is the amount of money that banks are told to ALWAYS have with them as per government requirement]. This impacted the financial industry badly. All other investors who had invested in mortgage based securities also had their investments brought down to near zero.

This is how I read, things unfolded themselves!


Popular posts from this blog

Explanation of the movie 'Revolver'

I saw the movie for the umpteenth time last night and I finally got it.

This is what the movie says:

1) In every game and con there is always a victim and there is always an opponent. It's good to know when you are the former so you can become the latter.

2) But the question is how do you prepare yourself for this game?

3) You only get smater by playing a smarter opponent.

4) The smarter the game the smarter the opponent

5) Checkers is an example of such a game. Chess is a better game. Debate is an even better opportunity to learn and so on.

6) But the question is where does the game stop? or one can ask what is the smartest game one can play?

7) The answer according to the movie is: "The game of con you play with yourself".

The text below has been added on 3 Dec 2008 and is based on a comment posted on October 30, 2008, at time 4:12 PM. I have only recently understood what this person meant and it is …

The beauty of self-negation

Self-negation is the act of exercising your will power to do what you don’t want to do such that you benefit from this act [of self negation]. The more one practices self-negation the better you get at controlling your will and making it do what you want it to, when you want it to.

For obvious reasons this can have tremendous benefits. Just imagine a situation where your superior wants you to sit late or gives you a task that is very difficult and you have enough control over yourself to not get flustered! In fact imagine turning your world into the world you always imagined as a child… by taking the difficult steps, through self-negation…one can only marvel at the beauty of creating the world you want!

We get the chance to practice self-negation many times in the day, each chance another ‘opportunity’ to get better at controlling ourselves.

Every time we sit down to eat for example we can eat good food in the quantity that the body requires and after that leave some space in our stoma…

Why feedback is important

We learn about the world as we get feedback from things within it such as from family, friends, mentors and even books.

Feedback can tell you where you went wrong and affirm what you do right. It can thus help you predict the future.

Interestingly there are people I have met who question the importance of feedback. They say: “I can figure out everything I need to on my own. I don’t need feedback like others do.” This is not true. In fact there is a big danger lurking in this notion.

If the world you are creating is your own you might get stuck in it or some part of it and not know what to do next.

If however, this world of yours and all parts of it are based on some feedback you will always know who to ask if you get stuck.

Somebody once said that "fundamentally we are here not to be seen, but to see" i.e. to see things outside of ourself. You will notice that all growth you have had has owed itself to some consistent feedback.

Suppose you wrote an essay. You wouldn't rea…