Skip to main content

What caused the recent US Financial Crisis

“What exactly happened” is a scope I don’t have answers for. But I do have a certain understanding I have gathered from the internet.

It started with the FED deciding to tighten the monetary policy. This resulted in low real interest rates. Returns from financial securities are tied to interest rates set by the FED such that the basic return [on their money] anybody can make is from a short-term government bond, which impacts the return customers are going to get when they put their money in the bank, which impacts the money people want if they decide to raise the stakes and put their money in some place riskier with the promise of higher returns such as buying from the stock market.

In fact there are a number of different types of securities available such as the various kinds of stocks and bonds. All these securities make an inverted pyramid that make up all the financial instruments available for people to trade in.

So back to our story… when the FED reduced the interest rates all the financial securities were affected such that all of them were now providing low returns.

At this time people were becoming interested in buying houses in the US.

With an increasing trend in real estate purchases “mortgages” came in high demand.

Financial engineers developed a number of securities [that were part of the financial pyramid] that were based on these mortgages [with mortgages being the fundamental instrument at the bottom of the pyramid on which all these securities were based]. Since fundamentally people were buying houses, mortgages and all mortgage-based-instruments were a strong investment option for customers.

At a certain point in time a lot of real estate had been purchased in the US and there were signs that new customers would not come forward to buy real estate.

If I understand correctly Freddie Mac and Fannie May the two companies who owned most of the mortgages sold in the US were asked by the US Senate for a plan. At this point the two companies decided to enter the sub-prime market [prime is a credit rating threshold for a debtor below which he is denied a loan and above which he qualifies to get a loan. A sub-prime applicant is one who falls below this credit threshold] taking the percentage share of the sub-prime debtors in the mortgage market from below 5 % to about 20%.

When the sub-prime market came to its exhaustion point like the main market before it there were signs of trouble.

Investors decided to sell their share of mortgage-based-securities but nobody was willing to buy. The banks that had a major investment in these mortgage-based-securities were asked to mark-to-market these investments [mark to market means to mark the value of the security on their books at the market price] by [I think] the State Bank.

When this happened, the reserves of banks took a huge fall over-night and as a result they could not meet their reserve requirements [reserve requirement is the amount of money that banks are told to ALWAYS have with them as per government requirement]. This impacted the financial industry badly. All other investors who had invested in mortgage based securities also had their investments brought down to near zero.

This is how I read, things unfolded themselves!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explanation of the movie 'Revolver'

I saw the movie for the umpteenth time last night and I finally got it.

This is what the movie says:

1) In every game and con there is always a victim and there is always an opponent. It's good to know when you are the former so you can become the latter.

2) But the question is how do you prepare yourself for this game?

3) You only get smater by playing a smarter opponent.

4) The smarter the game the smarter the opponent

5) Checkers is an example of such a game. Chess is a better game. Debate is an even better opportunity to learn and so on.

6) But the question is where does the game stop? or one can ask what is the smartest game one can play?

7) The answer according to the movie is: "The game of con you play with yourself".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text below has been added on 3 Dec 2008 and is based on a comment posted on October 30, 2008, at time 4:12 PM. I have only recently understood what this person meant and it is …

What the journey means to me

My journey so far has been about discovering the meta rules of how the self works. The essence of what I have learnt is that the self can change and in fact does change every time it undergoes an experience. Where any experience is significant because of the meaning it carries for us. It means something to us by the fact: it changes our feelings from state (state a) to another state (state b). Where this movement between states is a process we can call witnessing.  The exercise of witnessing can be powerful and enriching.  In fact if we could communicate what we have witnessed through poetry or through prose, perhaps with the aid of metaphors, we could share these experiences with our family, friends and with the larger community. 
Thus to go in retrospect and search for meaning in the experiences we have had can help us grow mature, become stronger and make us more aware.

My Criteria for my marriage partner

1) She should be a home maker. 10 on a scale of 10
2) I should be able to fall in love with her and her with me … 7 on a scale of 10.

First criteria:

10 on a scale of 1-10 for this criteria because I consider my family my second self. The better my partner will be at making my family the best the better off my second self will be. Who doesn’t want to aim for the best? In accordance with this she should have the best of the characteristics that every home maker should have:

1) Intelligent
2) Practical
3) Ability to take stress and bounce back – agility of mind
4) High level of commitment
5) Principled
6) Caring
7) Want her children to be the best
8) Want to learn how to make her children the best

Of course there is an ideal woman out there who would rank very high in all these areas. But then I have to be practical too. I would want to marry the most ideal woman who is compatible with me. Compatibility is covered in the second criteria.


Second Criteria:

Description of scale:

5: passes the basic crite…