Skip to main content

Another perspective on violence in the Pakistani electronic media

The perspective by many outside the media is that a lot of violence is shown on television; that seeing this has a negative psychological impact on its viewers and incites more violence in society. They therefore think that journalists are acting irresponsibly and should instead save the country now that they have become so powerful; they should in fact save the country by educating the masses.

I attended a debate on this topic where I gathered a perspective that is at 180 degrees to the argument above and that defends why violence in the media is sometimes justified.

I will mention this point wise below:
1. Perspective: Seeing violence has a negative psychological impact on its viewers and incites more violence

Another perspective
Case 1: A study was conducted that found that the amount of violence shown on television in Japan and the US is about the same but its impact on the youth is very different. In the US violence is done by the good guys to save the day – in a sense violence is glorified – while in Japanese television violence is perpetrated by the bad guys and is always commented upon as something negative. The latter perspective while acknowledging violence notes that it is a bad thing. This makes one think violence is bad.

Case 2: At the time of the “Small Eid” after Hajj there is a ritual sacrifice of animals performed by Muslims around the world in which animals are slaughtered. It is encouraged that the act of “cutting the jugular vein” of the animal be performed by the owner and not by a hired butcher. Children are almost always witnesses to this act whenever they are present. Those who are not Muslims will find this act barbaric and even traumatic but those who have been raised as Muslims rarely if ever think of it as traumatic! Many feel that the act of sacrificing an animal to God is very noble because it requires that one spend their hard earned money buying the animal and distributing its meat to the poor many of whom don’t have an opportunity to eat meat throughout the year. This sacrifice doesn’t incite one to be violent in fact for many it becomes a very mundane act.

Case 3: “Zanjeer ka matam among the shias”. Shiite Muslims who perform this kind of matam view it positively in a way that is perhaps hard for non-shiite Muslims to relate to.

Conclusion: If violence is shown on the media in a way that doesn’t glorify murder but sympathizes with the victims of the attack the impact and therefore the results will be different.

2. Perspective: The media in Pakistan has become very powerful
Another perspective: The media is one institution of the society. On its own it can hardly bring about change. If the schools, hospitals, governments, lawyers, etc are not performing their function there is not much that the media can do. In fact in a society of uneducated people with a very weak intellectual framework and high intolerance the media is in fact quite powerless.

3. Perspective: The media should educate the masses about violence.
Another perspective: It is in the nature of the media to “communicate” and not to “educate”. Even this act of communicating is always disturbing because it wakens you up to a reality you didn’t know existed but it is the responsibility of the media to perform this act of “communication”.

Finally another fact that I discovered from the debate was that there is a lot of violence in Pakistan such as domestic violence, to assassination attempts, suicide bombings, violence and rape on the streets, violence involving forcing children to come on the streets and ask for money, etc.


Popular posts from this blog

Explanation of the movie 'Revolver'

I saw the movie for the umpteenth time last night and I finally got it.

This is what the movie says:

1) In every game and con there is always a victim and there is always an opponent. It's good to know when you are the former so you can become the latter.

2) But the question is how do you prepare yourself for this game?

3) You only get smater by playing a smarter opponent.

4) The smarter the game the smarter the opponent

5) Checkers is an example of such a game. Chess is a better game. Debate is an even better opportunity to learn and so on.

6) But the question is where does the game stop? or one can ask what is the smartest game one can play?

7) The answer according to the movie is: "The game of con you play with yourself".

The text below has been added on 3 Dec 2008 and is based on a comment posted on October 30, 2008, at time 4:12 PM. I have only recently understood what this person meant and it is …

The beauty of self-negation

Self-negation is the act of exercising your will power to do what you don’t want to do such that you benefit from this act [of self negation]. The more one practices self-negation the better you get at controlling your will and making it do what you want it to, when you want it to.

For obvious reasons this can have tremendous benefits. Just imagine a situation where your superior wants you to sit late or gives you a task that is very difficult and you have enough control over yourself to not get flustered! In fact imagine turning your world into the world you always imagined as a child… by taking the difficult steps, through self-negation…one can only marvel at the beauty of creating the world you want!

We get the chance to practice self-negation many times in the day, each chance another ‘opportunity’ to get better at controlling ourselves.

Every time we sit down to eat for example we can eat good food in the quantity that the body requires and after that leave some space in our stoma…

Why feedback is important

We learn about the world as we get feedback from things within it such as from family, friends, mentors and even books.

Feedback can tell you where you went wrong and affirm what you do right. It can thus help you predict the future.

Interestingly there are people I have met who question the importance of feedback. They say: “I can figure out everything I need to on my own. I don’t need feedback like others do.” This is not true. In fact there is a big danger lurking in this notion.

If the world you are creating is your own you might get stuck in it or some part of it and not know what to do next.

If however, this world of yours and all parts of it are based on some feedback you will always know who to ask if you get stuck.

Somebody once said that "fundamentally we are here not to be seen, but to see" i.e. to see things outside of ourself. You will notice that all growth you have had has owed itself to some consistent feedback.

Suppose you wrote an essay. You wouldn't rea…