Skip to main content

Recognizing corrupted art

Art may belong to one of two categories. The first is where it is healthy and the second is where it is corrupt. The question that worries me is how to tell good art apart from corrupt art.

The two attributes of corrupt art that I know of are
1. It glorifies malevolence
2. It is not popular among the masses;
where the first is the cause of the second.

So if I can tell malevolence apart from what is benign I should be able to tell when I come across art that is corrupt. The ability therefore to articulate malevolence ought to be useful, and not malevolent itself, since it helps in recognizing malevolence.

Thus art that contains a discourse on malevolence must be corrupt when it glorifies it instead of articulating the fault in it.


  1. Nice insight. Usually, artists who glorify malevolence are also hostile towards those who disagree. For instance, a popular myth circulated by such artists is that the masses do not have a good taste, and great art is only for the "initiated".

  2. To me Art means conveying feelings. Popular art is the one which conveys those feelings which we mostly can identify with and which are universally beneficial; it can be in any form or genre of art. As humans we have all sorts of feelings, in our different moods, but, the literature is the platform which must bring about a synthesis of all this in such a subtle way that the eventual outcome and its message should be beauty, harmony, bliss and oneness of the objectivity. An art that does not do that cannot be termed even art, because beauty means balance and we cannot term something beautiful if it is not balanced. So I would conclude, to me Art means conveying feelings that are beautiful and balanced (Thank you Khurram Ali Shafique Sahib for this approach)

  3. There is nothing to add here. I feel that this post and the two comments cover immense and welcome ground.

    Thanx, all three of you.

  4. I had a related insight into this recently. Here is what it was : )

    Sometimes a label that we give to a thing is so corosive to the mind it has a weaking effect. That is why 'Everything is an Affirmation of who I am' is a powerful mantra. But clearly for this to apply everything has to affirm and nothing be able to harm. This however requires a journey on the path of maturity. A journey that each individual should ideally undertake.

    But what about all the talk of consensus literature then?

    Consensus literatre - or literature that is acceptable and has consensus of the society - ought to be promoted more in society vs. high/dark literature for people who aren't mature to the point where they safeguard them selves from it's affects.

  5. However, since consensus literature can itself enable the journey that itself is a big reason to promote it.

  6. An articulation of good behavior provides us one tool to leverage human nature and be strong by it. The demonstartion of good behavior is also available to us through good art/literature as a second tool. Using them together should help internalize this education faster.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explanation of the movie 'Revolver'

I saw the movie for the umpteenth time last night and I finally got it.

This is what the movie says:

1) In every game and con there is always a victim and there is always an opponent. It's good to know when you are the former so you can become the latter.

2) But the question is how do you prepare yourself for this game?

3) You only get smater by playing a smarter opponent.

4) The smarter the game the smarter the opponent

5) Checkers is an example of such a game. Chess is a better game. Debate is an even better opportunity to learn and so on.

6) But the question is where does the game stop? or one can ask what is the smartest game one can play?

7) The answer according to the movie is: "The game of con you play with yourself".

The text below has been added on 3 Dec 2008 and is based on a comment posted on October 30, 2008, at time 4:12 PM. I have only recently understood what this person meant and it is …

My Criteria for my marriage partner

1) She should be a home maker. 10 on a scale of 10
2) I should be able to fall in love with her and her with me … 7 on a scale of 10.

First criteria:

10 on a scale of 1-10 for this criteria because I consider my family my second self. The better my partner will be at making my family the best the better off my second self will be. Who doesn’t want to aim for the best? In accordance with this she should have the best of the characteristics that every home maker should have:

1) Intelligent
2) Practical
3) Ability to take stress and bounce back – agility of mind
4) High level of commitment
5) Principled
6) Caring
7) Want her children to be the best
8) Want to learn how to make her children the best

Of course there is an ideal woman out there who would rank very high in all these areas. But then I have to be practical too. I would want to marry the most ideal woman who is compatible with me. Compatibility is covered in the second criteria.

Second Criteria:

Description of scale:

5: passes the basic crite…

What the journey means to me

My journey so far has been about discovering the meta rules of how the self works. The essence of what I have learnt is that the self can change and in fact does change every time it undergoes an experience. Where any experience is significant because of the meaning it carries for us. It means something to us by the fact: it changes our feelings from state (state a) to another state (state b). Where this movement between states is a process we can call witnessing.  The exercise of witnessing can be powerful and enriching.  In fact if we could communicate what we have witnessed through poetry or through prose, perhaps with the aid of metaphors, we could share these experiences with our family, friends and with the larger community. 
Thus to go in retrospect and search for meaning in the experiences we have had can help us grow mature, become stronger and make us more aware.